¶1A careful consideration of this record has led us to the conclusion that the court below was clearly right in dismissing the exceptions and confirming the master’s report. His findings of fact — so far at least as they are material to any of the questions involved in the specifications of error — were fully warranted by the evidence. On the facts thus established by the learned master’s findings and approval of the court, the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.
180 Pa. 25
Cone v. St. John
Decided January 25, 1897
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1897-01-25
Appeal, No. 322, Jan. T., 1896, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Pbila. Co., March Term, 1893, No. 910, dismissing bill in equity. Bill in equity to compel the assignment of a half interest in a patent.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1981
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1897-01-25
View the full empirical analysis of this case →