Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

181 N.J. 295

In re Scinto

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 9, 2004

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 2004-09-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2006

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-09-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-066 and DRB 04-067, concluding that MICHAEL R. SCINTO of VIENNA, VIRGINIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

¶3It is ORDERED that MICHAEL R. SCINTO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

¶4ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

¶5ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

/181/nj/295 · .json · Public domain