182 N.C. App. 365 - State v. Combs’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Barnes · State v. Mann · State v. Willis · 143 N.C. App. 187 - State v. Berry · 180 N.C. App. 527 - State v. Sloan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f two persons join in a purpose to commit a crime, each of them, if actually or constructively present, is not only guilty as a principal if the other commits that particular crime, but he is also guilty of any other crime committed by the othér in pursuance of the common purpose ... or as a natural or probable consequence thereof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Mason“is not determined by the defendant's actual distance from the crime; the accused simply must be near enough to render assistance if need be and to encourage the actual perpetration of the crime”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Kelly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.