¶1concurring in part and dissenting in part.
¶2We would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division on all issues, substantially for the reasons expressed in both the unanimous and majority portions of that court’s per curiam, opinion.
¶3For affirmance in part; reversal in part — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, and RIVERA-SOTO — 5.
¶4Concurring in part; dissenting in part — Justices LONG and WALLACE — 2.