Moses v. Hand’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““This appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding raises only one question as to a minor fault in the journal entry of the judgment in which the appellant was convicted after a plea of guilty to a charge of second degree burglary. The journal entry has long ago been corrected by an order nunc pro tunc. The order deny the application for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed upon the authority of Wilson v. Hudspeth, 165 Kan. 666 , 198 P. 2d 165 , [certiorari denied, 335 U. S. 909 , 93 L. Ed. 442 , 69 S. Ct. 419 , rehearing denied 336 U. S. 911 , 93 L. Ed. 1075 , 69 S. Ct. 511 ]; Browning v. Hand, 184 Kan. 365, 366 , 336 P. 2d 409 , [certiorari denied, 361 U. S. 926 , 4 L. Ed. 2d 240 , 80 S. Ct. 295 ]; Converse v. Hand, 185 Kan. 112, p. 115-116 , 340 P. 2d 874 , and authorities cited. It is hereby so ordered.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Moses