¶1This appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding raises only one question as to a minor fault in the journal entry of the judgment in which the appellant was convicted after a plea of guilty to a charge of second degree burglary. The journal entry has long ago been corrected by an order nunc pro tunc. The order denying the application for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed upon the authority of Wilson v. Hudspeth, 165 Kan. 666, 198 P. 2d 165; Browning v. Hand, 184 Kan. 365, 366, 336 P. 2d 409; Converse v. Hand, 185 Kan. 112, p. 115-116, 340 P. 2d 874, and authorities cited. It is hereby so ordered.
188 Kan. 317
Moses v. Hand
Decided May 17, 1961
Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1961-05-17
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1962
4 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
““This appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding raises only one question as to a minor fault in the journal entry of the judgment in which the appellant was convicted after a plea of guilty to a charge of second degree burglary. The journal entry has long ago been corrected by an order nunc pro tunc. The order deny the application for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed upon the authority of Wilson v. Hudspeth, 165 Kan. 666 , 198 P. 2d 165 , [certiorari denied, 335 U. S. 909 , 93 L. Ed. 442 , 69 S. Ct. 419 , rehearing denied 336 U. S. 911 , 93 L. Ed. 1075 , 69 S. Ct. 511 ]; Browning v. Hand, 184 Kan. 365, 366 , 336 P. 2d 409 , [certiorari denied, 361 U. S. 926 , 4 L. Ed. 2d 240 , 80 S. Ct. 295 ]; Converse v. Hand, 185 Kan. 112, p. 115-116 , 340 P. 2d 874 , and authorities cited. It is hereby so ordered.””
quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. Moses
Relies on Wilson v. Hudspeth · Converse v. Hand · Browning v. Hand
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1961-05-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →