Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 MICH 558 - McCreery v. Roff

McCreery v. Roff’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2005

7 state decisions

401915192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gage v. Sanborn · Lamb v. Jeffrey · Frisbee v. Frisbee · Moore v. Smith · Powers v. Golden Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * It is now settled that the purchaser, at a foreclosure by advertisement, ordinarily acquires an equitable interest in the land which he may, during the period given for redemption, transfer in full to another. And that his assignee, if there is no redemption, will take the legal title when it matures exactly as the original bidder himself would have taken it. Gage v. Sanborn, 106 Mich. 269 , 64 N. W. 32 . # * Sjt * * * * * * * Such legal title does not vest at once upon the auction sale on statutory foreclosure (Jones on Mortgages, § 1884), but only at the expiration of the period allowed for redemption. Until the end of that period the foreclosure proceedings may be abandoned, if the parties choose to do so (Dodge v. Brewer, 31 Mich. 227 ), or a subsequent mortgagee may still demand an assignment of the mortgage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““If there were such deceit as equitably would still authorize redemption by Roff, his application therefor must be to a court of equity. Gage v. Sanborn, 106 Mich. 269 ( 64 N. W. 32 ).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.