189 U.S. 508
Docket No. 357.
Supreme Court of the United States
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted April 6, 1903.
Decided April 20, 1903.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1903-04-20
<p>Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska.</p>
2 counsel of record
Relies on Eustis v. Bolles · Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Fitzgerald · Pierce v. Somerset Ry
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1903-04-20
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1997
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska.
¶2Mr. Lionel C. Burr and Mr. Charles L. Burr for plaintiffs in error.
¶3Mr. J. H. Broody for defendants in error.
¶4Per Curiam.
¶5Writ of error dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Pierce v. Somerset Railway, 171 U. S. 648; Gillis v. Stinchfield, 159 U. S. 658 ; Missouri Pacific Railway Company v. Fitzgerald, 160 U. S. 556. See Lyon v. Gombert, 63 Nebreska, 630.