Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 F.3d 12

Docket No. 93-6762.

United States v. Ehi

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Dec. 29, 1993. Decided: March 16, 1994.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-03-16

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Turner v. Smith

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-03-16

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CR-90-252-MJG, CA-92-2916-MJG).

Issac Ehi, appellant pro se.

Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ehi, Nos. CR-90-252-MJG; CA-92-2916-MJG (D. Md. July 6, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/19/f3d/12 · .json · Public domain