Currin v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 1 · 26 U.S.C. § 1040 · 7 U.S.C. § 511 · 7 U.S.C. § 601
Relies on Gibbons v. Ogden · United States v. Butler · Carter v. Carter Coal Co. · Lemke v. Farmers Grain Co. · United States v. Doremus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“without uniform standards of classification and inspection the evaluation of tobacco is susceptible to speculation, manipulation and control,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Currin v. Wallace“for the protection of producers and others engaged in commerce and the public interest therein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Currin v. Wallace“unreasonable fluctuations in prices and quality determinations occur,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Currin v. Wallace
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.