Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

19 Wash. App. 32

Davy v. Moss

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 9, 1978

Court of Appeals of Washington · decided 1978-01-09

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Notwithstanding any other provisions of chapter 4.84 RCW and RCW 12.20-.060, in any action for damages where the amount pleaded by the prevailing party as hereinafter defined, exclusive of costs, is one thousand dollars or less, there shall be taxed and allowed to the prevailing party as a part of the costs of the action a reasonable amount to be fixed by the court as attorneys' fees.”

quoted by 4 later decisions, including 52 Wash. App. 864 - Kingston Lumber Supply Co. v. High Tech Development Inc., 39 Wash. App. 298 - Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeod

Applies WA 12 § 12.20.060 · WA 4 § 4.84.250 · WA 4 § 4.84.260 · WA 4 § 4.84.270 · WA 4 § 4.84.280

Relies on 64 Wash. 2d 453 - Puget Construction Co. v. Pierce County

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-01-09

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2014

5 state decisions

2019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Williams, J.

¶1The question on this appeal is whether the trial court, in an action for a breach of contract, erred in refusing to allow to the prevailing party the reasonable attorney's fees called for in RCW 4.84. The answer depends upon the meaning of "action for damages." We reverse. Pertinent sections of the statute are:

Notwithstanding any other provisions of chapter 4.84 RCW and RCW 12.20.060, in any action for damages where the amount pleaded by the prevailing party as hereinafter defined, exclusive of costs, is one thousand dollars or less, there shall be taxed and allowed to the prevailing party as a part of the costs of the action a reasonable amount to be fixed by the court as attorneys' fees.

¶2(Italics ours.) RCW 4.84.250.

The plaintiff, or party seeking relief, shall be deemed the prevailing party within the meaning of RCW 4.84.250 when the recovery, exclusive of costs, is as much as or more than the amount offered in settlement by the plaintiff, or party seeking relief, as set forth in RCW 4.84.280.

¶3RCW 4.84.260.

The defendant, or party resisting relief, shall be deemed the prevailing party within the meaning of RCW 4.84.250, if the plaintiff, or party seeking relief, recovers nothing, or if the recovery, exclusive of costs, is the same as or less than the amount offered in settlement by the *34defendant, or the party resisting relief, as set forth in RCW 4.84.280.

¶4RCW 4.84.270.

Offers of settlement shall be served on the adverse party in the manner prescribed by applicable court rules. Offers of settlement shall not be filed or communicated to the trier of the fact until after judgment, at which time a copy of said offer of settlement shall be filed for the purposes of determining attorneys' fees as set forth in RCW 4.84.250.

¶5RCW 4.84.280.

¶6The term "damages" has been defined as

the sum of money which the law awards or imposes as pecuniary compensation, recompense, or satisfaction for an injury done or a wrong sustained as a consequence either of a breach of a contractual obligation or a tortious act.

¶722 Am. Jur. 2d Damages § 1 (1965). Otherwise,

The law of damages deals with the standards, rules, and processes used by the courts in measuring compensation for losses and injuries.

¶8C. McCormick, Handbook on the Law of Damages 1 (1935). In Washington, the word "damages" has been construed to include both tort and contract actions. Puget Constr. Co. v. Pierce County , 64 Wn.2d 453, 392 P.2d 227 (1964).

¶9It is evident that the settlement scheme contained in RCW 4.84 is designed to promote nonjudicial determination of court actions and to discourage resistance to just claims for damages in cases in which litigation costs may well exceed the amount involved. Both of these purposes apply to actions for damages on contract as well as in tort.

¶10The cause is remanded to the trial court for allowance of attorney's fees to the prevailing party.

*35Farris, C.J., and Andersen, J., concur.

¶11Petition for rehearing denied April 12, 1978.

¶12Review denied by Supreme Court October 20, 1978.

/19/washapp/32 · .json · Public domain