Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

190 A.3d 594

Menkowitz, E. v. Peerless Publications, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 1, 2018

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2018-08-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2019

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Did the Superior Court disregard this Court's holding in Joseph III by failing to apply the appropriate standards of causation and deference in vacating the judgment entered by the trial court awarding substantial compensatory and consequential damages to Elliot Menkowitz, M.D. for harm to reputation and loss of past and future earnings?”

quoted by 1 later decision, including E. Menkowitz, M.D., Aplt. v. Peerless Publications

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2018-08-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM .

¶1 AND NOW, this 1 st day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Did the Superior Court disregard this Court's holding in Joseph III by failing to apply the appropriate standards of causation and deference in vacating the judgment entered by the trial court awarding substantial compensatory and consequential damages to Elliot Menkowitz, M.D. for harm to reputation and loss of past and future earnings?
/190/a3d/594 · .json · Public domain