Baker v. Harrah's’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet Metal · 660 So. 2d 7 - Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co. · In re Bleichner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the factfinder's findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“When legal error interdicts the fact-finding process in a workers' compensation proceeding, the de novo , rather than the manifest error, standard of review applies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Generally, a report prepared by an expert is not admissible because it is hearsay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Evans v. Evans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.