Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 191 NJSUPER 454 - Smith v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co.

Smith v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Brown · Levin v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills · Quaremba v. Allan · In Re Petition of Keogh-Dwyer · Lemke v. Bailey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We are of the view that where, as here, separate and distinct classes of disability are the result of a single traumatic injury, the award of compensation, while separately stated to identify the classes, should be cumulated in computing the award to provide the enhanced benefits available. [ 191 N.J.Super. 454, 462 (1983).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(8) establishing relief from the far-reaching effect of the "going and coming rule" decisions by defining and limiting the scope of employment[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.