191 U.S. 559
Docket No. 72.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued for plaintiff in error November 11, 1903.
Decided November 16, 1903.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1903-11-16
2 counsel of record
Relies on Harris v. Barber · Ida McClung v. William a Penny · Willis v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1903-11-16
Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2010
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Mr. John M. Taylor for plaintiff in error.
¶2No appearance for defendant in error.
¶3In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
¶5Decree affirmed with costs. Willis v. Eastern Trust and Banking Company, 167 U. S. 76; Harris v. Barber, 129 U. S. 366; McClung v. Penny, 189 U. S. 143.