Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

192 N.J. 218

In re Armour

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 6, 2006

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 2006-12-06

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2014

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-12-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-178, concluding that FRANK L. ARMOUR of EAST HANOVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1966, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months for violating RPC 8.4(b)(commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer), and good cause appearing;

¶3*219It is ORDERED that FRANK L. ARMOUR is suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

¶4ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

¶5ORDERED that pursuant to Rule l:20-20(c), respondent’s failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule l:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent’s petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

¶6ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

¶7ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

/192/nj/218 · .json · Public domain