Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

194 Pa. 224

Irwin v. Hill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1899

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1899-12-30

Appeal, No. 190, Oct. T., 1899, by-plaintiff, from decree of O. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., Dec. T.t 1898, No. 624, dismissing bill in equity. Bill in equity for partition. The facts appear by the opinion of Collier, J., which was as follows: The bill in this case prays for partition of a tract of land in Mifflin township, Allegheny county, Pennsylvania.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1959

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1899-12-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam,

¶1Our consideration of the record in this case has satisfied us that there is no error in the decree dismissing the bill at plaintiff’s costs.' We find nothing in any of the specifications of error that requires discussion.

¶2The decree is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge who presided at the hearing in the court below, and the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s costs.

/194/pa/224 · .json · Public domain