Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes

Raymond VAN DUREN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Leigh E. RZASA-ORMES, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Argued March 25, 2008.

Decided June 19, 2008.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 2008-06-19

Relies on 394 N.J. Super. 254 - Van Duren v. Rzasa-Ormes

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-06-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably A-18-14 Templo Fuente De Vida Corp v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (2016), Kolbe v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (2013)

5 federal appellate · 8 district · 13 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Kevin McNulty, argued the cause for appellant (Gibbons, Newark and Schepisi & McLaughlin, Englewood Cliffs, attorneys; Mr. McNulty, Michael R. Griffinger, Newark, John A. Schepisi, Englewood Cliffs and Glenn M. Finkel, on the briefs).

¶2Steven R. Klein, Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent (Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, attorneys; Mr. Klein and Susan M. Usatine, on the briefs).

¶3David G. Evans, Pittstown, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parrillo's opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 394 N.J.Super. 254, 926 A.2d 372 (2007).

¶6For affirmanceChief Justice RABNER and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO and HOENS7.

¶7OpposedNone.