195 U.S. 625
Docket No. 64.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1904-11-14
<p>In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas.</p>
2 counsel of record
Relies on Dent v. State of West Virginia · Hawker v. People of New York · Augustus Reetz v. People of the State of Michigan
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1904-11-14
Cited by 10 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1963
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas.
¶2Case below, 66 Kansas, 710.
¶3Mr. J. Jay Buck for plaintiff in error.
¶4Mr. Clad Hamilton and Mr. C. C. Coleman for defendants in error.
¶6Judgment affirmed with costs. Hawker v. New York, 170 U. S. 189; Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114; Reetz v. Michigan, 188 U. S. 505; Gray v. Connecticut, 159 U. S. 574;