Dilley v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

cited by 7 later decisions

March 1980

most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 277 · 10 U.S.C. § 3441 · 10 U.S.C. § 3447 · 10 U.S.C. § 681

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Weinberger v. Salfi · Parker v. Levy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“possibility), vacated the judgment and remanded for reconsideration in light of a statute that had not been brought to the district court's attention. 186 U.S.App.D.C. at 134 , 567 F.2d at 1127 . The dicta of a vacated district court judgment is not, of course, binding on this court, but it is worth noting that Colm is not necessarily inconsistent with our analysis here. Had Colm involved a violation of the statute governing separation proceedings, the constitutional issue would never have been reached. The district judge's reference to the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Michael F. Dilley, Captain, U.S. Army Reserve v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army Raymond W. Fontaine, Major, U.S. Army Reserve v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army Milton D. O'Quinn v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army. Major Russell A. Powell v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army · Dilley v. Alexander
“to which they were entitled. The exact path traversed by the Henderson and Ricker courts to reach this conclusion is unclear. Though expressly disavowing reliance on the court martial analogue, 175 Ct.Cl. at 698 , the Henderson court called the proceedings”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Michael F. Dilley, Captain, U.S. Army Reserve v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army Raymond W. Fontaine, Major, U.S. Army Reserve v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army Milton D. O'Quinn v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army. Major Russell A. Powell v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army · Dilley v. Alexander
“H.R.Rep.No.1066, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 49 (1951). The Senate Committee recommended and the Senate adopted the same language, with the additional clause requiring the Secretary of Defense to promulgate regulations regarding the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Michael F. Dilley, Captain, U.S. Army Reserve v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army Raymond W. Fontaine, Major, U.S. Army Reserve v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army Milton D. O'Quinn v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army. Major Russell A. Powell v. Clifford L. Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Army · Dilley v. Alexander

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.