Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 198 OKLA 95 - Render v. Schafer, Inc.

Render v. Schafer, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1994
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1994

6 state decisions

20194619501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lillard v. Meisberger · Manes v. Hoss · Little v. Employer's Casualty Co. · Werfelman v. Miller · Timberlake v. Norris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a party desiring to appeal fails to give notice in open court of his intention to appeal to this court at the time judgment is rendered or within ten days thereafter if motion for new trial is unnecessary, this court is without jurisdiction to review such judgment and an appeal therefrom will be dismissed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.