198 Pa. 395
Decided February 18, 1901
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1901-02-18
Appeal, No. 249, Jan. T., 1900, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., June T., 1894, No. 1702, in partition proceedings in case of Harriet Palethorp v. Robert Palethorp et al. Bill in equity for partition by life tenant. See Palethorp v. Palethorp, 194 Pa. 408.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1914
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1901-02-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1A careful consideration of the defendant’s exhaustive argument against the plaintiff’s contention has not convinced us of error in the master’s report or in the decree entered by the court below. It follows as a natural and reasonable sequence that the decree should be affirmed.
¶2Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellants.