Wilde v. Morrell

Decided February 18, 1901

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1901-02-18

Appeal, No. 261, Jan. T., 1900, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1900, No. 432, discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, in case of Solomon Wilde v. Edward deV. Morrell. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. From plaintiff’s statement it appeared that Mother M. Katharine of the Convent of the Blessed Sacrament in March, 1894, was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $5,000.

Affirmed · Decided 1901-02-18

Per Curiam,

¶1In our opinion the affidavit of defense filed in this case is a sufficient answer to the plaintiff’s statement of claim. The elaborate and ingenious argument of the plaintiff’s counsel has not convinced us that the court erred in discharging the rule for judgment.

¶2Judgment affirmed. .