Hobbs v. Swenson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

15 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On January 7, 1947 appellant pleaded guilty in a Maryland state court to a charge of robbery and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment. He contends that counsel were not appointed to advise him, that he was not allowed to present witnessess in his behalf and that he was not allowed to question the witnesses against him. Appellant has repeatedly made application for habeas corpus to the state courts which have been denied and the Supreme Court of the United States has denied certiorari. State ex rel. Hobbs v. Warden, [194] Md. [722], 70 A.2d 814 , Hobbs v. Warden, [197] Md. [629], 80 A.2d 38 , Id., 341 U.S. 936 , 71 S.Ct. 851 , 95 L.Ed. 1364 . It appears also that prior applications have been made to both United States Judges in the District of Maryland and have been denied by them. The application from the denial of which this appeal was taken presents no such unusual circumstances as would have warranted the District Judge in issuing a writ of habeas corpus in such situation. The application appears to be entirely without merit; but we are without jurisdiction to consider the appeal because there is no certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253 . Bernard v. Brady, Warden, 4 Cir., 164 F.2d 881 ; Berman v. Swenson, Warden, 4 Cir., 177 F.2d 717 ; Hansen v. Warden, 4 Cir., 198 F.2d 470 .” Hobbs v. Swenson, Warden, 4 Cir., 199 F.2d 268 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 206 F. Supp. 301 - Hobbs v. Pepersack