Hamilton v. Guinan’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 411 · 29 U.S.C. § 412 · 29 U.S.C. § 504
Relies on Strauss v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHER. OF TEAMSTERS, ETC. · Jackson v. the Martin Company · 198 F. Supp. 46 - Rosen v. DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 9 OF NEW YORK CITY, ETC. · Sheridan v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 626
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court found that plaintiff had been given a full and fair hearing, in accordance with provisions in the union rules and with section 411(a) (5). The court did not discuss the issue of jurisdiction, but it is apparent that plaintiff had been disciplined for action he took as a member of the union, and thus sections 411(a) (5) and 412 were clearly applicable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“* * * but since the discipline was imposed on plaintiff in part for acts taken as a member of the union, jurisdiction apparently would lie under section 412.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.