Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

1995 Ohio 58

State v. Goney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1995

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1995-06-14

Appellate procedure—App.R. 26(B)—Application for reopening appeal from judgment and conviction based, inter alia, on claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel—Application denied when errors present matters outside the record and, thus, are not appropriate for direct appeal.

Relies on 87 Ohio App. 3d 497 - State v. Goney · 87 Ohio App. 3d 496 - Rollison v. State · State v. Goney

Decided 1995-06-14

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 
72 Ohio St.3d 314
.]




             THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. GONEY, APPELLANT.
                       [Cite as State v. Goney, 
1995-Ohio-58
.]
Appellate procedure—App.R. 26(B)—Application for reopening appeal from
        judgment and conviction based, inter alia, on claim of ineffective assistance
        of appellate counsel—Application denied when errors present matters
        outside the record and, thus, are not appropriate for direct appeal.
       (No. 94-2590—Submitted March 21, 1995—Decided June 14, 1995.)
     APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 13474.
                                  __________________
        {¶ 1} Appellant, Thomas B. Goney, was convicted of rape, in the Court of
Common Pleas of Montgomery County. He appealed, alleging that it was error for
the trial court to admit evidence of his prior conviction for bank robbery to impeach
his testimony. The court of appeals disagreed and affirmed the conviction. State
v. Goney (1993), 
87 Ohio App. 3d 497
, 
622 N.E.2d 688
.
        {¶ 2} Subsequently, appellant filed an application to reopen his appeal
under App. R. 26(B), alleging, inter alia, ineffective assistance of appellate counsel
for failure to allege the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The court of appeals
held that several of the errors presented matters outside the record and thus were
not appropriate for direct appeal. The court also found that appellant failed to
demonstrate prejudice in the other claims and denied the application to reopen.
Appellant now appeals to this court.
                                  __________________
        Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and
Carley J. Ingram, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
        Thomas B. Goney, pro se.
                                  __________________
                            SUPREME COURT OF OHIO




        Per Curiam.
        {¶ 3} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated
in its opinion.
                                                               Judgment affirmed.
        MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and
COOK, JJ., concur.
                              __________________




                                         2

/1995/ohio/58 · .json · Public domain