¶1Filed 9/30/97 by Clerk of Supreme Court
¶2IN THE SUPREME COURT
¶3STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
¶9Denise Laney, Plaintiff and Appellee
¶11v.
¶13Shawn Uecker, Defendant and Appellant
¶17Civil No. 970076
¶18Appeal from the District Court for Mercer County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James M. Vukelic, Judge.
¶19AFFIRMED.
¶20Per Curiam.
¶21Richard B. Baer (argued), of Richard B. Baer, P.C., 1003 E. Interstate Ave., P.O. Box 1221, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1221, for defendant and appellant.
¶22R. Rick Maixner (argued), of Schmitz, Moench & Schmidt, 222 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 2076, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2076, for plaintiff and appellee.
¶23Laney v. Uecker
¶24Civil No. 970076
¶25PER CURIAM.
¶26[¶1] Shawn Uecker appeals from the trial court judgment awarding Denise Laney custody of their minor child. The trial court’s custody determination is a finding of fact which will not be set aside on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous. Huesers v. Huesers, 1997 ND 33, ¶6, 560 N.W.2d 219; Ternes v. Ternes, 555 N.W.2d 355, 357 (N.D. 1996). We conclude the trial court’s custody determination was not clearly erroneous. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 35.1(a)(2), N.D.R.App.P.
¶27[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
¶28Mary Muehlen Maring
¶29William A. Neumann
¶30Dale V. Sandstrom
¶31Herbert L. Meschke