¶1Formatting provided courtesy of State Bar of South Dakota
and South Dakota Continuing Legal Education, Inc.
222 East Capitol Ave.
Pierre, SD 57501-2596
¶2VIRONMENT, INC.,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CHARLES E. LIGHT,
Defendant and Appellee.
[1999 SD 43]
¶3South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from the First Judicial Circuit, Yankton County, SD
Hon. Lee A. Tappe, Judge
#20557--Reversed
¶4Dennis C. McFarland, Sioux Falls, SD
Attorney for Plaintiff and Appellant.
¶5Timothy L. James, James & Associates, Yankton, SD
Attorneys for Defendant and Appellee.
¶6Considered on Briefs Jan 14, 1999; Opinion Filed Apr 7, 1999
¶7AMUNDSON, Justice.
¶8[¶1] This is a companion case to Yankton Ethanol v. Vironment, 1999 SD 42, the cases involve identical facts and two identical issues:
¶91. Whether the court erred in dismissing plaintiff's complaint as barred by the period of limitation set forth in 11 USCS 546 (a)(1)(A).
¶102. Whether the court erred in granting the amended motion to dismiss based upon SDCL 47-7-50.
¶11As to these issues, our decision in Yankton Ethanol controls the motion to dismiss in this case. Therefore, this case is also reversed and remanded
¶12[¶2] MILLER, Chief Justice, SABERS, KONENKAMP, and GILBERTSON, Justices, concur.