2 Binn. 453
Decided March 31, 1810
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1810-03-31
THIS was a foreign attachment to March 1796, in which judgment was entered at the third term; but no proceeding had since taken place in the cause. The attachment was laid in the hands of Mr. Waddington one of the plaintiffs.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1946
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1810-03-31
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We do not see cause to dissolve the attachment, as the plaintiffs have accounted for the delay in issuing the writ of inquiry. If upon the arrival of the plaintiffs’ papei-s from England, they neglect to execute a writ of inquiry, there may be ground for the court to interpose.
¶2Rule refused.