Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 F.3d 1149

Docket No. 92-7096.

Dana S. Graham v. Augusta Correctional Center, (Warden) Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 7, 1993. Decided: August 16, 1993.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-08-16

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-08-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2011 · most notably Kerstetter v. United States (1995), 778 F. Supp. 2d 458 - Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bloomberg L.P. (2011)

29 federal appellate ·

330199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CV-91-752)

Dana S. Graham, Appellant Pro Se.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Dana S. Graham seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Graham v. Augusta Correctional Center, No. CV-91-752 (E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)

/2/f3d/1149 · .json · Public domain