Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 F.3d 1149

Docket No. 92-6456.

Hayden v. Mayhew

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 25, 1993. Decided: August 18, 1993.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-08-18

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Dana S. Graham v. Augusta Correctional Center, (Warden) Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-08-18

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge. (CA-91-239-R)

Reginald Eugene Hayden, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Reginald Eugene Hayden appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Hayden v. Mayhew, No. CA-91-239-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 25, 1992, Mar. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/2/f3d/1149 · .json · Public domain