2 Monag. 665
Decided February 12, 1891
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1891-02-12
Appeal, No. 205, Jan. T., 1891, by George Clarence Baldwin, an heir, to review a decree of the O. C. Chester Co., sustaining exceptions… Held: that the assignment was invalid for want' of delivery, and the proceeds belonged to Trough’s estate. “ In Scott v. Lauman, 104 Pa. 593, Wm Scott executed an assignment of a certificate of deposit to his brother, Andrew Scott, by endorsement thereon under seal, and instructed his attorney ‘ that he should take it with him, and put it…
Decided 1891-02-12
¶1Judgment affirmed.
¶2Note. — It is suggested that the supreme court overlooked the second proposition involved in the above case. That branch of the case was only briefly argued by counsel for plaintiff in error, and counsel for defendants in error were not heard. That point was not noticed in the opinion of the court below.