Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 U.S. 92

Wycoff v. Longhead

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 1, 1785

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1785

Relies on Respublica v. Weidle

Cited in Bouvier (1839)’s definition of “Usury”

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1785

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1952

3 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

40178517901800181018201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶2THIS was an a action on a promissory note; to which the defendant pleaded the act of Assembly against usury; and thereupon the following points were ruled by the Court, in their charge to the Jury.

¶31st. That where more than leg I interest was included in any note, bond, or specialty, the whole amount could not be sued for and recovered: But the plaintiff was entitled, in such case, to a verdict for the just principal and lawful interest.

¶42d. That if a man, directly, or indirectly, actually receives more than fix per cent, he incurs a forfeiture equal to the money &c. lent; but if an action is brought to recover the amount of the loan, a verdict ought not to be given for the defendant, as that would, in effect, be putting the money into his pocket, instead of working a forfeiture to the Commonwealth.

¶53d. That a man may, bona fide, purchase any security for the payment of money, at the lowest rate he can, without incurring the penalties of usury.

/2/us/92 · .json · Public domain