Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Walk. 348

Dushane v. Allen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 16, 1885

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1885-02-16

No. 225 Jan. Term, 1884. This was an action, brought in the Court below by James Allen against A. O. Tinstman, doing business as A. Overholt & Co., and J. M. Dushane, security. Suit was brought on a note for $2,990.80, signed by A. Overholt & Co. and J. M. Dushane as security. It was dated 17th day of Jan., 1874, and due in one year.

Relies on Hartman v. Danner · Shaffer v. Clark

Decided 1885-02-16

¶1The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Common Pleas on the 16th Feb., 1885, in the following opinion:

Per Curiam.

¶2The unquestioned facts of this case bring it within the law as declared in Hartman vs. Danner, 74 Pa. 36; Shaffer vs. Clark, 90 Pa. 94; Rumberger vs. Golden, 3 Out. 34; and kindred cases and fully sustain this judgment.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

/2/walk/348 · .json · Public domain