Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Yeates 280

Filler v. Harmon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1798

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1798-03-15

<p>Demand of security for a debt from a freeholder need not be in writing, and when the plaintiff has sworn to such demand, a counter affidavit of the defendant will not be received.</p>

Decided 1798-03-15

Sed pro quer.

¶1We cannot receive such counter-affidavit, under the act of assembly, passed 20th March 1724-5. Dall St. Laws, 225. It is analogous to a question of bail, (2 Stra. 1757. 1 Wils. 888. 2 Burr. 2017. 1 Term Rep. 717) in the king’s bench, where when the affidavit of a debt is positive, no contradictory proof is permitted to be given. Neither is it absolutely necessary, though it may be prudent to make such demand in writing under the act.

¶2Motion denied.

/2/yeates/280 · .json · Public domain