Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Yeates 93

Arnold v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1796

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1796-09-15

These three causes came on to be tried, by the samo jury, by consent. The first two suits were brought for freight and demurrage on a charter party, dated 29th March, 1793, between Bentley, captain of the brig Harriot, (owned by Arnold of Rhode Island,) and Robin Florence and Co., letting the brig to freight from Port au Prince to Philadelphia, for 1000 dollars, and 100 livres per day demurrage from 29th April, 1793.

Decided 1796-09-15

Per curiam.

¶1This is a mercantile case, to which the strict rules of evidence do not apply. But independent of this circumstance, the exception goes merely -to the credit of the witnesses. Though they may be concerned in the question now to be tried, yet they cannot be affected by the event of this suit. The verdict here can neither be given in evidence for or against them in a future cause, and therefore their depositions must go to the jury, to be weighed by them in point of credibility, under all the circumstances. [Vid 4 Burr. 2255. 3 Term Rep. 32, 34, 36, 309, 310.]

¶2The jury found a- verdict for the plaintiff on clear evidence, *95for 934 dollars 66 cents, which was entered in the second action, and the first discontinued, and in the third suit a verdict was given for the defendant.

/2/yeates/93 · .json · Public domain