Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 F. Cas. 370

Reason v. Bridges

U.S. District Court

Decided December 15, 1807

U.S. District Court · decided 1807-12-15

[This was an action by Reuben Reason, a negro, against John Bridges.] The defendant having challenged twelve of the jurors peremptorily, challenged Mr. Smith, one of the tales, for favor. Eight jurors having been sworn, were sworn as triors.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1989

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1807-12-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

THE COURT

¶1refused to suffer Mr. Smith to be examined on oath as to his religious opinions, whether he was a Methodist, and whether the Methodists had religious scruples as to the legality of slavery. A witness was sworn, who testified that it was not an essential tenet of their religion that slavery was contrary to the divine law; but some of them were of that opinion.

¶2THE COURT refused to permit the witness to be asked whether it was the prevailing opinion among the people called .Methodists, and decided that it was incumbent on the party challenging to show, either that it was an essential tenet of théir religion, or was the individual opinion of the juror.

/20/fcas/370 · .json · Public domain