Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

20 N.J. 428

120 A.2d 92

State v. Mastic

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THOMAS MASTIC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Submitted January 16, 1956.

Decided January 23, 1956.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1956-01-23

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1963

2 district · 3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1956-01-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*431Mr. Thomas Mastic, in propria persona, for the appellant.

¶2Mr. Guy Lee, Jr., Gloucester County Prosecutor, for the respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

¶5For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

¶6For reversal — None.

/20/nj/428 · .json · Public domain