Hardin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
23 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 102nd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Montgomery v. State · Kelly v. State · Eastern Publishing & Advertising, Inc. v. Chesapeake Publishing & Advertising, Inc. · Dinkins v. State · Ladd v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the expert is from a [discipline which] involvefs] technical or other specialized knowledge, experience, and training as opposed, to the scientific method, the test for reliability is: ■ (1) whether the .field of expertise is a legitimate one, (2) whether the subject matter of the expert’s testimony is within the scope of that field, and (3) whether the expert’s testimony properly relies on and/or utilizes the principles involved in the field.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“• the nature of the error; • the persistence of the prosecutor; • the flagrancy of the violation; • the particular instruction given; • the weight of the incriminating evidence; and • the harm to the accused as measured by the severity of the sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.