Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2000 SD 1 - Engels v. Ranger Bar, Inc.

Engels v. Ranger Bar, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

4 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 213 Cal. App. 2d 729 - Lingsch v. Savage · City of Colton v. Schwebach · Jasper v. Smith · Wangen v. Knudson · Wolford v. Freeman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Punitive damages must be relatively large to accomplish the objective of punishing the wrongdoer and deterring others from similar wrongdoing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`firmly and definitely convinced a mistake has been made.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.