Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2001 UT 41 - State v. Gardner

State v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Sery · Watkiss & Campbell v. Foa & Son · Swenson Associates Architects, P.C. v. State Ex Rel. Division of Facilities Construction · State v. Jiminez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an appeal filed before a formal post-judgment order is entered is ineffective and a new appeal has to be filed within thirty days after the entry of the formal order”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the entry of the order denying a new trial”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.