State v. Cram’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 district · 32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably State v. Worwood (2007), Tschaggeny v. Milbank Insurance Co. (2007)
1 district · 32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Allen v. United States · Arizona v. Washington · State v. Dunn · State v. Holgate · State v. Tillman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[Als a general rule, claims not raised before the trial court may not be raised on appeal”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson · State v. Smith“[Flirst, to give the trial court an opportunity to 'address the claimed error, and if appropriate, correct it,' and second, that 'a defendant should not be permitted to fore-go making an objection with the strategy of enhaneling] the defendant's chanees of acquittal and then, if that strategy fails, . claim{ing] on appeal that the [clourt should reverse."”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[In order to preserve a claim or an objection for appellate review, the defendant must raise a timely or contemporaneous claim or objection.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Worwood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.