Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2003 Me. 52

Hale v. Antoniou

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 15, 2003

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · decided 2003-04-15

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2008

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Demetri Antoniou appeals from an order entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Humphrey, J.) denying his motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay judicial proceedings. The underlying action involves claims Michael and Edie Hale brought on behalf of their son, Jordan, against Antoniou for intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil assault. Antoniou asserts that the Superior Court erred in concluding that USA Hockey Inc.’s arbitration procedure did not govern the Hales’ claims. Because the Court is evenly divided, we affirm the judgment.

¶2 The entry is:

¶3 Judgment affirmed.

/2003/me/52 · .json · Public domain