Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2003 UT App 170 - State v. Sloan

2003 UT App 170 - State v. Sloan’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Tillman · State v. Rimmasch · United States v. Balfany · State v. Bullock · State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An issue is inadequately briefed when the overall analysis of the issue is so lacking as to shift the burden of research and argument to the reviewing court.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “argument that does not contain reasoned analysis based upon relevant legal authority is inadequately briefed and we will not consider the issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “contains no legal analysis and cites no legal authority”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.