Charbonneau v. Gorczyk’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
19 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Turner v. Safley · Karen Sutton Kimberly Hintons v. United Air Lines Inc · Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey · Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hospital · Dutcher v. Ingalls Shipbuilding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prohibits state agencies like the DOC from excluding an individual from a DOC program because of the individual's disability”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reduc[e] their sentences at a faster rate than inmates at other facilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“unmistakably includes State prisons and prisoners within its coverage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.