Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 OK 13 - Ross v. Pace

Ross v. Pace’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schepp v. Hess

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[g]iven the number of opportunities [plaintiff's] attorneys were afforded to respond to the requests for admission . . . , and the notice of [the] motion for summary judgment and hearing set in the matter,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The discretion granted trial judges in opening or vacating their judgments during term extends to a reasonable degree in both directions. Unless the refusal to vacate a default judgment is an abuse of that discretion, such order is not reversible. If the question whether there was an abuse depends upon a question of fact pertaining to the grounds for vacating, upon which question there was conflicting evidence, the ordinary rule applies and the presumption is that the finding of fact was consistent with the order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.