State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 56 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Bronson v. Swensen (2007), Rivers v. Exec. Dir. of the Utah Dep't of Envtl. Quality & the Dir. of the Utah Div. of Water Quality (2017)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 56 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Kolender v. Lawson · Wisconsin v. Yoder · Employment Division Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. L Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Implicitly, rule 24(a)(9) requires not just bald citation to authority but development of that authority and reasoned analysis based on that authority'”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage“contain the contentions and reasons of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, ... with citations to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the record relied on.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“'Constitutional challenges to statutes present questions of law, which we review for correctness.' " Jones v. Jones , 2013 UT App 174 , ¶ 7, 307 P.3d 598 (quoting State v. Green , 2004 UT 76 , ¶ 42, 99 P.3d 820 ), aff'd , 2015 UT 84 , 359 P.3d 603 . "Nevertheless, 'legislative enactments are presumed to be constitutional, and those who challenge a statute or ordinance as unconstitutional bear the burden of demonstrating its unconstitutionality.' " Id. (quoting Green , 2004 UT 76 , ¶ 42, 99 P.3d 820 ). ¶24 Third, Father contends that the juvenile court erred by "allowing text messages to be read into the record without any foundation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.