2005 Pa. Super. 200 - Commonwealth v. Price’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “registration, notification, and counseling requirements for offenders under Megan's Law”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Commonwealth v. Greco · 2009 Pa. Super. 121 - Commonwealth v. Williams

2. “In evaluating a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict winner, together with all reasonable inferences therefrom, the trier of fact could have found that each and every element of the crimes charged was established beyond a reasonable doubt. We may not weigh the evidence and substitute our judgment for the fact-finder. To sustain a conviction, however, the facts and circumstances which the Commonwealth must prove must be such that every essential element of the crime is established beyond a reasonable doubt.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2008 Pa. Super. 83 - Commonwealth v. Bullock