¶2AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. Petitioner alleged a manifestly unreasonable and excessive sentence, supported by a Pa.R.A.P 2119(f) statement to the Superior Court, but was denied review pursuant to Commonwealth v. Burton, 770 A.2d 771 (Pa.Super.2001) (claim of excessiveness fails to raise substantial question when within statutory limits). The order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED for review consistent with Commonwealth v. Mouzon, 571 Pa. 419, 812 A.2d 617 (2002) (Opinion Announcing Judgment of the Court). Jurisdiction relinquished.
573 Pa. 654
Commonwealth v. Reed
Decided July 21, 2003
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2003-07-21
Relies on Commonwealth v. Mouzon · 2001 Pa. Super. 62 - Commonwealth v. Burton
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-07-21
How this case has been cited
Cited by 199 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2020 · most notably Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc. (2011), Liss & Marion, P.C. v. Recordex Acquisition Corp. (2009)
1 federal appellate · 195 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →