Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 Pa. Super. 90 - Commonwealth v. Menezes

2005 Pa. Super. 90 - Commonwealth v. Menezes’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2024

22 state decisions

110200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Reed · Commonwealth v. Stair · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeMesquita · Commonwealth v. Packer · 444 Pa. Super. 170 - Commonwealth v. Henderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as a result of conduct on which such a charge is based.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “§ 1921. Legislative intent controls (a) The object of all interpretation and construction of statutes is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the General Assembly. Every statute shall be construed, if possible, to give effect to all its provisions. (b) When the words of a statute are clear and free from all ambiguity, the letter of it is not to be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its spirit. (c) When the words of the statute are not explicit, the intention of the General Assembly may be ascertained by considering, among other matters: (1) The occasion and necessity for the statute. (2) The circumstances under which it was enacted. (3) The mischief to be remedied. (4) The object to be attained. (5) The former law, if any, including other statutes upon the same or similar subjects. (6) The consequences of a particular interpretation. (7) The contemporaneous legislative history. (8) Legislative and administrative interpretations of such statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Pennsylvania law generally interprets the term 'shall' in legislative enactments to declare a mandatory duty”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.